Toshiba Toshiba America Nuclear Energy Corporation
March 7, 2008 AdministratorIt 's March 6 news of yesterday' s announcement by Japan's Toshibahave given birth in January 2008 to a company in the U.S. with the specific purpose of gaining market share in the civil nuclear sector in the United States: "Toshiba America Nuclear Energy Corp ".
At the moment, "Toshiba America Nuclear Energy Corp" has about 30 employees, is headquartered in Alexandria, Virginia (USA) and became operational with effect from 'beginning of this March.
The objectives of this new company will be: to promote and assist facilities with reactors ABWR (Advanced Boiling Water Reactor), and provide maintenance services for existing nuclear plants, promoting fourth-generation reactors.
It should be noted that Toshiba is already well represented in the U.S. market, having bought Westinghouse in January 2006. And the new company, Toshiba America Nuclear Energy Corporation will be inserted between the newly founded Toshiba and Westinghouse to convey better the exchange of knowledge in the nuclear field.
Toshiba is the will to play an increasingly important role in the American market, as major U.S. energy companies have announced plans to build new nuclear plants in coming years (about trentatina of new plants in total).
24 Responses to "Toshiba Toshiba America Nuclear Energy Corporation
paolo del bene wrote:
7 August 2010 to 04:27
http://no-to-the-nuke.blogspot.com
Lorenzo Riva writes:
7 August 2010 at 09:59
You are a free radical?
It's all to say!
http://it.babelfish.yahoo.com/translate_url?doit=done&tt=url&intl=1&fr=bf-home&trurl=http://www.partitoliberale.it/2010/05/13/assalti-al-pubblico-denaro-gli-impianti-fotovoltaici-di-mario-rampichini/%23comment-8484&lp=it_en&btnTrUrl=Traduci
Administrator writes:
7 August, 2010 at 11:31
Official Staff Commentary
Please Renzo Riva and Paolo Del Bene,
There appears to be a grudge between you on a personal level
and discuss.
raised every time the shot trying to be more rude to each other in a reciprocal manner. but this is not the intention that should animate.
discussion can also be harsh but must be for Arguments and ideas, not the person.
Ideas are criticized for trying to argue the its arguments.
should not criticize people. ever.
try to keep the discussion interesting all readers, even those who may not
involved but to read to try inquire.
Thanks
Lorenzo Riva writes:
August 7, 2010 at 13:50
Other irons in the fire for eco-terrorists.
The collection?
Nonsense that costs us dear
We have to congratulate the electorate for not allowing the Greens and Communists to be present in parliament except that they themselves have first left the country to do too much damage to the foolish policies inspired by environmental disaster.
One of these policies was that of the collection which are queued soon the smart of cdx who refused to be outdone claims.
I remember the action that led bassoliniani bestial claims, along with the Green environment minister Campania, emergency waste after spending two decades in 20,000 billion lire.
We are awaiting the work of the local judiciary to know something of the ideological mismanagement of ecologists.
Recycling is the most foolish would devise some apples buggy to the point bacare all political buckets.
What sense does it recover paper, plastic and other combustible materials when then with biomass plants burning wood and paper materials? The plastics are a direct derivative of oil that should burn and produce energy in the waste-burning fuels than petroleum itself.
In my town, Buja, we suffered the humiliation of recycling, proposed and implemented by an administration of CDX, and if they still make sense to pursue these political categories approved in the same nonsense.
Bujesi Many are dissatisfied with this "innovation" but has benefited the mayor who now sits on the Board of Directors of the Net
None of the directors has nothing to say about future increases that hurt us all for this new "fashion" even when 95% of waste goes to landfill to recycling collected? Might as well take her before!
On the sidelines say that the market for recycled and there is virtually no market it is available with prices that do not pay even the industrial cycle for its collection and production. The paper mills of northern Europe, who schemes woods, water and nuclear energy at bargain prices, can provide high-quality paper at lower cost.
Just mention the paper Romanello that was made to close and then reopen for pollution not aggravate the employment situation on direct and indirect (economic sector of recycling).
Then, since there is no end to the worst, that paper that nobody wants even free, as the burn will not end if any biomass directly to landfills.
Across Europe, municipal solid waste incinerators are one figure for all: Denmark it burns over 50%.
Anyone who has seen the incinerator in Vienna knows how other nations deal with and solve problems instead of landfills with unnecessary commingling public-private partnerships that deserve some legal step to see clearly in the quarrying concessions, then subsequently turned into landfill.
Indecent politicians and citizens increasingly delegating "sotans.
Who does the wolf eats sheep but not in Trieste, a city endowed with incinerator.
Lorenzo Riva
P.L.I. F-VG
Energy and Environment
Edward writes:
August 12, 2010 at 19:33
To Paul:
everyone has the right to think as he wants and I respect your point of view. But the thing that compels me to intervene, without wanting to give the item to anyone, is the confusion and inaccuracy of his statements. I think you carry forward an ideological battle of his own (to Toshiba or less if you buy your PC does not care about them to him as millions more people buy them) but this is his business. I am interested in some of his sentences to emphasize the fact that I disagree and express some opinions:
also remember that in 1987 citizens ITALIAN (ITALIAN do not know if she is or not), are expressed in the referendum, against the adoption of nuclear power plants.
No adoption: Italy at the time had four plants in operation, a fifth (Montalto di Castro) is almost finished and was starting the authorization process of the sixth (Trinity 2)
Among other things, the referendum, see art. 75 of the Constitution can only be repealed or maintained a law in place, but in no way cancel the ratification of international treaties, Italy, in fact, is still part of the European Atomic Energy Community (EAEC ) or Euratom is an international, contemporary with the EEC, which with the Treaties of Rome of March 25, 1957, contracted with other European countries in developing and coordinating programs related to nuclear energy and ensure the peaceful use thereof.
On the other hand, already the referendum of 1987 could not (said millions of times on this forum) to be understood "No nuclear Nuclear", it only put more constraints Enel (then not yet privatized) in identifying sites for future nuclear and coal plants. It was decided just to fucking political interests, a moratorium for five years suspended the construction of similar plants (in 1992 could start again) The bus stop across the industry, closing and abandoning all nuclear plants in operation or nearing completion was only a political choice, stupid, cowardly and dishonest - remember the article in 1994 in the Corriere della Sera The gas killed the atom "if you wanted to (PSI) to help kill the nuclear (supported by DC) because the supply of gas was much more "easy" peck bribes - Enel process Bitetto former socialist administration, followed by Peter.
If you think about opposing nuclear power, or rather an energy mix that includes nuclear, it means allow even after years and years, the lobbies of the coal, gas and especially oil emperor, and speculate all they want! ... As in '87 it was said: "The Greens have won with the anti-nuclear referendum" Many replied "The real victory of the oil!" ... about to see what has happened in the Gulf of Mexico? And in China? And India? ... In this case the risks and disasters abound. Difficult, very difficult to believe me, find a human activity to zero risk.
Only the region of Tuscany with the electricity it produces, could go ahead with the rest of Italy and this therefore speaks volumes about the real fabbisogno.No is not true. I do not know who says these things absurd: Tuscany (I'm Tuscan) covers 55% of its requirements with power plants concentrated between Livorno and Piombino, Scarlino (GR) and Arezzo and the various hydro in the province of Lucca cover about 20% and Geotemia, concentrated in Siena, Pisa and in the near Amiata covers 23% (Enel expects to reach 30% in 2015) the remaining 2% from biomass, wind, photovoltaics. In confirmation, there was recently a conference in Florence on regional energy policy, where Dr. Frederick Montomoli, general secretary of Flaei-CISL, the category of workers Energy says:
"From the standpoint of philosophy is shared aim to replace more oil as energy source, but from the standpoint of actual risk of having just another dream book, which will remain unrealized as has been for the previous plan of 2000 . To target to achieve 25% energy, and even 50% of electricity produced from renewable sources, with current technology, feasible. For solar energy it would take huge expanses of solar panels and wind power there is thinking the Louis Vuitton Cup, with the boats still 4 days, to remind us that the wind does not blow on command. A bill - continues Flaei Secretary - is the goal shared, to encourage the use of alternative energy sources and renewable ones, is another rely on the Regional Energy Plan, which is simply unachievable. "
As will be seen from videos, Chernobyl is a wasteland, not inhabited by anyone
Even this is not true. Around Chernobyl, there are other towns (Chernigov, and Mazyr Pripyat, the most contaminated when they were evacuated 50,000 people) which benefited from the enormous amount of energy of Chernobyl (4 reactors of 1000 MW which worked until 2000) for their factories and housing.
I come to say that over 23 years research has gone forward on nuclear, because it was locked with a vote by the citizens, therefore there is no safe nuclear.
Not only has the research progressed, I mean in Italy, but also the know-how, so that the Italians are the world build nuclear power plants (example: Cernavoda in Romania together with the Canadian Ansaldo, Enel in France where there nell'EPR of Flamaville 32 Italian companies operating other small to medium-shielding and electronics) for Italian companies as luck Camozzi Nucleco, Ansaldo Nuclear, ACN, the same Enel and Sogin not blindly abandoned this highly technical field. I hope this will allow us to have power even safer than those already in operation ... and I'd be afraid to have a nuclear power plant or waste dump near our house, scares me more, or an illegal dump piles of corrugated asbestos required to liberating 'opened as a petrochemical and chemical industry is beryllium, benzene and mercury (I do not know if these places exist all the security and attention that exists in the nuclear field), but these are my opinions that surely will not share.
About Transmission Report "nuclear deception" that you quote, physicists, engineers and other personnel, both right and left, have called with RAI due to lack objectivity and ambiguous data, erroneous - even false - it was made from the bet. The link, extract from their forum, and below can help, if desired, to investigate the many allegations of false or erroneous program:
archivionucleare.com / files / / trick-media-bullshit-core ...
With regard to the long list she put together degl'incidenti nuclear accidents in the military sector, accidents to test facilities or rare human errors that have nothing to do with nuclear power that will start in Italy or that can also occur in other industrial activities (eg . Seveso)
Incidentally there are several inaccuracies:
for example Barsebaeck is in Sweden and Denmark: Denmark has never had nuclear power plants Sweden has ten.
The high levels of cesium 137 contamination discovered by the French Alps are so caused by the passage of ferrous scrap from eastern Europe, but these came from steel plants in the Republic of Dagestan, where there are no nuclear facilities.
Block discharge of fuel cartridges Super Phoenix, he also spoke French daily Le Figaro: in fact the material was downloaded at a later time in complete safety .. here can not speak of an accident.
A Tornese Scotland The aircraft crashed into the sea caused no effect on the central is more than 5 km.
I stop here, however several incidents that you mention, in fact failed the INES level 3 and have been quickly contained, but with words and numbers can prove everything and nothing. Often those vapors were accidentally released from the secondary circuit and not radioactive, as well as to assess the damage, it is used incorrectly Becquerel Bq (atom decays per second) instead of or millisiviert Siever (mCi) or the absorbed dose.
However, she remains firm on his beliefs and I on my own but at least we faced.
Thanking the patience he has displayed, the greeting cordially.
paul good
August 13, 2010 at 22:31
well since it went against the popular consensus, I can not help but turn over all these threads in the hands of authorities, who decide if you are deceiving the public on Italian sources said: "alternatives" that have nothing to do with the "solar, wind, geothermal, only sources of clean energy.
also address waste disposal, it is convenient to Sigr. Lorenzo Riva, who may not know that the electricity bill you pay a fee for the CIP6 energies that should be "alternative", as it happens there is also similar between the nuclear Sigr Lorenzo Riva support enormously.
I start thinking that Sigr. Lorenzo Riva should help some manufacturers of nuclear power plants or having a nuclear plant to have its start, but is currently blocked.
Coal for the question: "there is clean coal.
However as I mentioned in a thread last, then deleted,
since none of the people here is a scientist at the Sigr. Stefano Montanari, who can speak with facts in hand, according to informed opinion, does not make sense to pursue such talks.
started by reading:
edizionicreativa.it/content/b2c/body.php? p = UFJPRFVDVA ==&...
macrolibrarsi.it / books / __il_girone_delle_polveri.php
http://www.panstanford.com/books/nanosci/v001.html
macrolibrarsi.it / books / __rifiuto-reducing-and-recycling-for-life ...
In an e-mail between me and Sigr Stefano Montanari, told some facts and kindly offered to answer gave me all the explanations.
the concepts of Sigr. Lorenzo Riva, make water from everywhere, therefore, provide to read.
written is also reported on other sites, so that nothing gets lost.
Paolo Del Bene writes:
13 August, 2010 at 23:20
For Sigr. Edoardo,
I inform you that I would like to give me the HER, we are not brothers, cousins or relatives nor related, then I would be called by my name and surname, unless it costs too much noise.
A popular saying: says that: "you never stop to know a person, and to do this, what should be necessary to eat a whole box of salt".
July 23, 2010 at 01:43
This is a story of 2008, but I'd like to know at which point it is today
Toshiba with nuclear power.
For my part, I will never buy Toshiba laptops, so I will avoid to finance nuclear power.
I did the shit to buy a IBM Thinkpad T23, then discovered the altars of IBM, the plaintiff in the extermination of the Jews, so I was not aware of this, then I eventually found by Feltrinelli in Rome, a book by Edwin Black, "The IBM and the HOLOCAUST "published by Rizzoli, the English title: IBM AND THE HOLOCAUST http://www.ibmandtheholocaust.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfevjFskGJA
this video is about the Toshiba
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dblJ3qnLOwo
and that the Westinghouse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkgfioloucM&NR=1
AT & T http://www.macpassradio.com/pages/att.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkDsIzZVJxw
Bayer-time Holocaust
http://www.ahrp.org/infomail/05/01/27a.php
google.it / search? sourceid = chrome & ie = UTF-8 & q = bayer + I ...
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer
and so on, so it does not save one! has more or less buried war crimes and continues to work quietly, as if nothing had happened and then break his balls myself, about why so many other journalists, I dared to use the google translator online and publish some titles Italian journalist and make them known abroad.
because I told that if I had not removed, there would been some controversy, I published an email received from blogspot.com and below the various movies, then download it.
greetings
paolo
Giacomo writes:
July 27, 2010 at 17:38
@ Paul
"For my part, I will never buy Toshiba laptops, so I will avoid to finance nuclear power."
Tu.Io glad I own several and I buy 'cause I'm among the best in the game although a little more' expensive than others.
Toshiba products are good regardless of whether or not the nuclear face.
Instead, of partisans like you, I'd rather avoid.
Greetings.
July 27, 2010 at 23:01
Now the "communists" and all those who are orphans of "totalitarian ideology" are pouring in recycling and no to everything.
I am the eternal doom of the worse the better.
The answer that I sent to the local press on a story alloys ripompaggio night proposed a hydroelectric plant in Friuli.
Ripompaggio the central
of Somplago - UD
I have read carefully the considerations engineer Dino Franzil of 17 on us "Debate" the Messenger of Udine.
No fault on his undoubted quality engineering that come through its technical considerations and accounting deployed.
Instead, what the lacks, in my humble opinion, is its assumed position of tribune for the salvation of no one knows what.
Invest and earn for him are the work of the "devil" for producing the dung.
Then he unfolded a plan "Communist" where businesses and entrepreneurs are given to public ridicule because they craft their own.
But will not realize the opportunity for the area of institutional graft compared with the economic powers who wish to complete the work that all technicians are considered necessary.
Necessary to meet the energy demand peaks for the shortcomings of our PEN (National Energy Plan) without more than twenty years following the closing of the infamous nuclear sponsored by almost all (only declared themselves against the Liberals and Republicans) and institutionally Tombs and De Mita Andreotti.
Andreotti also brings responsibility, not blame, having used part of the proceeds of the tariff A3 energies similar to the construction of power plants suitable for combustion of waste oil and the industry that favored the oil industry.
Unfortunately, some ideologically oriented mindset where they see only the difficulties but who has entrepreneurial mindset sees new opportunities.
That Ing. Franzil rallied Legambiente and Verdi (why not WWF, etc. Our Italy.?) Makes sense now as certain minority environmental policy that I want to emphasize in words not mine but to which I concur.
Carry a pitch book "Green outside, red inside - Deception environmentalist," Chapter 4 "The illusion of energy from the sun," on page 85, written for four hands by Associate Professor of Environmental Chemistry ' University of Modena, Franco Battaglia and Professor Emeritus Renato Angelo Ricci and also among the founders of the "Galileo 2001": "... this is why we believe that among the great evils which mankind has had to suffer on account of itself ( Nazism, communism, terrorism), there is also green environmentalism.
The programs which, if implemented, make it more dangerous than Nazism, Communism + + terrorism put together. "
I can suggest is to ask for the area of the three municipalities concerned of the tariff advantages on power consumption as compensation for the use of catchment area due to end use as shown in part I wrote in a distributed on November 29 last year during saw that this assembly to Trasaghis Councillor De Alessi Anna?
Obviously with respect to all the terms required by applicable law and granted clearance can only be conditional.
Lorenzo Riva
PLI F-VG
Energy and Environment
July 28, 2010 at 12:48
Errata: Alloys
Corrige: linked
But the curious thing is who leadeth these dances: a regional council of the F-VG of the Northern League.
At worst there is never end!
July 28, 2010 at 17:51
saw the great love you have for nuclear, I think aviate also great enthusiasm for the results of nuclear
Chernobyl disaster incident PART 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSRC1_OZPIg
Chernobyl disaster incident PART 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zByDY-nPNJc&feature=related
Chernobyl Decay and Deformed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v= rvAJ_u3Q0Hw&feature=related
Chernobyl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LA_PnAQONo & feature=related
Chernobyl 22 years after
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKyPC-NR_4o&feature=related
Chernobyl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2jL5ubnd8g&feature =related
Vitimas do Acidente nuclear de Chernobyl
http://www.youtube.com/Watch?v=BS2_RL_CzQc&feature=related
Chernobyl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzgSEg2TkIE&feature=related
Chernobyl. Prypyat
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v= K5ouMiTmy-o&feature=related
28 days later chernobyl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnigFmQTC4s&feature=related
Inside the Chernobyl Reactor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDaP0UZVbE0&feature=related
Glowing nuclear reactor graphite 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqmuVaHpw-Y&feature=related
Glowing nuclear reactor graphite 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v= 22aTqTKRPBI&feature=related
Glowing nuclear reactor graphite 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxmNqsGhNhY&feature=related
Brilliant Greenpeace Chernobyl video on
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3u_8frR0IpE&feature=related
Chernobyl: 23 years later
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVknvN7ni7Y&feature=related
Huge fish in Chernobyl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnO9SevdCZ8&feature=related
mutants in Chernobyl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttQO6DvRi58&feature=related
Fish near the reactor 4 at Chernobyl. (True HD) (Summer '09)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reB4kJsurjg&feature=related
Human Mutations-Mutant Museum
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abcsZZ9Duxw&feature=related
Ghost city Chernobyl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpoVzAArUN0&feature=related
if you think nuclear power is not dangerous then how justified these horrors?
Chernobyl disaster (Ukraine 1986) part 1 of 10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luSpdSyT1ys&feature=related
Chernobyl disaster (Ukraine 1986) part 2 of 10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8401Qd1PNQc&feature=related
Chernobyl disaster (Ukraine 1986) part 3 of 10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsMgDwzJReY&feature=related
Chernobyl disaster (Ukraine 1986) part 4 of 10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiTQ8OGcYNo&feature=related
Chernobyl disaster (Ukraine 1986) part 5 of 10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlkiO-RFxZs&feature=related
Chernobyl disaster (Ukraine 1986) part 6 of 10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOYZrqZnNgA&feature=related
Chernobyl disaster (Ukraine 1986) part 7 of 10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vNdtsteNXA&feature=related
Chernobyl disaster (Ukraine 1986) part 8 of 10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEPLPteebWg feature=related
Chernobyl disaster (Ukraine 1986) part 9 of 10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRhjCGFDLU4&feature=related
Chernobyl disaster (Ukraine 1986) part 10 of 10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpyE7yc0_ZQ&feature=related
since you feel so confident of nuclear, why do not you put in direct contact with the uranium inside the reactor? so do not draw any consequence.
Carlo Rubbia (Nobel Prize) on nuclear pt.1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7nO1D9zfnw&feature=related
Carlo Rubbia (Nobel Prize) on nuclear pt.2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcVYtygPF4E&feature=related
Cricket, Rubbia nuclear
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEXSb8OHhLU&feature=related
Cricket NUCLEAR BARI 21mag09 (1 N)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGBxVBJFuDA&feature=related
no to nuclear power. Cricket Annozero a video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccIUK2OX8OA&feature=related
Beppe Grillo and nuclear - (DVD DELIRIUM TOUR 2008)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tb5OlHbv48Y&feature=related
Nuclear waste repositories in Piedmont
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqC0WHqCUnI&feature=related
URANIUM - The Scandal of France contaminated. Vol 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiJESPdLXpA&feature=related
URANIUM: The Scandal of Contaminated France - Vol.2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1K1dUKr4EXc&feature=related
URANIUM: The Scandal of Contaminated France - Vol.3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQIsEitsfgY&feature=related
URANIUM: The Scandal of Contaminated France - Vol 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-uNPEofkl0&feature=related
URANIUM: The Scandal of Contaminated France - Vol 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q98HpDtL8YA&feature=related
URANIUM: The Scandal of Contaminated France - Vol 6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8WJZZG4L8c&feature=related
URANIUM: The Scandal of Contaminated France - Vol 7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-CW6niVO14&feature=related
URANIUM: The Scandal of Contaminated France - Vol 8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmjjbgi-7LS&feature=related
URANIUM: The Scandal of Contaminated France - Vol 9
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMDJTYGZN4w&feature=related
REPORT: THE NUCLEAR WASTE IN GERMANY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTEdJX6rlrs&feature=related
REPORT: NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN FRANCE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEnxeJyPOe8&feature=related
Report 03/29/2009 Deception (Nuclear) 2-9 Living With Uranium
youtube.com / watch? v = FotHJvRClPc & feature = related
Report 03/29/2009 Deception (Nuclear) 3-9 Damage to the human genome Effect Consequences of Nuclear
http://www.youtube.com/Watch?US5BR8VDWtEst=&feature=related
Report 03/29/2009 Deception (Nuclear) 4.9 Management of radioactive uncontrollable
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZzlW6irP0I&feature=related
Report 03/29/2009 Deception (Nuclear) 5-9 mismanagement of nuclear waste Nuclear Lies Petrol-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vvSUg_HJTA&feature=related
Report 03/29/2009 Deception (Nuclear) 6-9 The agreement Ghost: From Nuclear Policy Protocol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVYcaOC7R44&feature=related
Report 03/29/2009 Deception (Nuclear) 7-9 As it cost? The Scherzo energy independence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRZT7QIhKwM&feature=related
Report 03/29/2009 Deception (Nuclear) 8-9 Waste & Energy Consumption Of Degrowth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e8loLSt5Uk&feature=related
Report 03/29/2009 Deception (Nuclear) 9-9 renewable energy installations the threshold of sustainability
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9L_Nmt9y4Q&feature=related
REPORT Deception (1 of 6)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HXpe9U2NMo&feature=related
REPORT Deception (2 of 6)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=jTpbx2WZhoE&feature=related
REPORT Deception (3 of 6)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRfjoPbjmtM&feature=related
REPORT Deception (4 of 6)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ4Ulm3M7JA&feature=related
REPORT Deception (5 of 6)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAueJHml-64&feature=related
REPORT Deception (6 of 6)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPUhU7hQPfk&feature=related
So why do not you eat and drink that is contaminated with uranium? so there is no risk for you.
Nuclear power: Stefano Montanari says NO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxIRC0ukTIE
Stefano Montanari 1 of 9
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGsK3S0YBOE&feature=related
Stefano Montanari 2 of 9
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RRPE_q3dDA&feature=related
Stefano Montanari 3 of 9
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sAK0BYY_9g&feature=related
Stefano Montanari 4 of 9
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKWK4kb55hQ&feature=related
Stefano Montanari 5 of 9
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBUA8Fq4BSQ&feature=related
Stefano Montanari 6 of 9
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6KkygZ0EQ0&feature=related
Stefano Montanari 7 of 9
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOlGqIPxNQw&feature=related
Stefano Montanari 8 of 9
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Kc16PMV2dU&feature=related
Stefano Montanari 9 of 9
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSwQr3dB4tU&feature=related
The microscope and Montanari Damn Cricket
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h74I0M2G8iQ&feature=related
Stefano Montanari vs Gasparri Giugliano and fans of incinerators - May 6, 2008
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bui92NjU4io&feature=related
Stefano Montanari Giugliano rubbish incinerator on May 6, 2008
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ece_YbGOG0Y&feature=related
Stefano Montanari on particulate matter
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v= 5TzV_cRXboE&feature=related
I can only tell you that I am right and you wrong, there are communists, but scholars, heroes, dead journalists, investigations, research showing that you're wrong and I could go on to infinity
July 29, 2010 at 07:47
where is the thread that I wrote? you perhaps afraid to make known the risk of nuclear power? omit here so what has been reported in other forums or blogs
where you can not delete anything, because you are not the owners of the blog, so stay fooled and at the same time, what was written and published since been removed, had been sent for information to other people by e-mail , then inform them that you are afraid of what I had written, otherwise you would not have nothing to hide.
Regards paolo
July 29, 2010 at 08:52
@ Paolo
The only "nuclear threat" of this website and 'that there is a moderation to comments ie' the comments themselves, before being published, should be evaluated in terms of appropriate language and content is not offensive ...
You do not seem to mind their example curses?! Exist on each site there is no difference even if you're the bad guys ... ..
The communications should read it yourself underneath the space used to the inclusion of your comment. ...
Good continuation and before troubling conspiracy and murder of her going was read more ...
July 29, 2010 at 09:54
Find me the insult or blasphemy place in what I wrote because I keep a copy of what I wrote!
July 29, 2010 at 09:59
saw the great love you have for nuclear, I think aviate also great enthusiasm for the results of nuclear
if you think nuclear power is not dangerous then how justified these horrors?
since you feel so confident of nuclear, why do not you put in direct contact with the uranium inside the reactor? so do not draw any consequence.
So why do not you eat and drink that is contaminated with uranium? so there is no risk for you.
I can only tell you that I am right and you are in wrong, there are communists, but scholars, heroes, dead journalists, investigations, research showing that you're wrong and I could go on to infinity
"This is the text that I wrote last night with references to different URL's, then where is the blasphemy or insult?
July 29, 2010 at 10:13
@ Paolo
Then play to understand once and for all:
1) The instructions, rules, and there are clear, leggere.Valgono enough for everyone, even for me.
2) If you came to do destructive polemic think you have the wrong place.
3) If you have problems with nuclear know that here are your personal and nobody can 'ease your pain of living.
Having said that 'anyone' and always will be 'welcome on this site, in the spirit of constructive discussion.
I hope I have spoken on behalf of all. Have a good Buona Day.
July 29, 2010 at 10:31
then I should believe the claims of the Sigr. Lorenzo Riva
PLI F-VG Energy and Environment in ITALIAN they say Energy and Environment, Energy and hildren not written, what then already left much to be desired.
a person who does not know to express in ITALIAN, who knows what it will tell us, however, go beyond, unless the ITA (GLI) ANO our Premier, who can never be understood, or rather everyone understands well only every two minutes that belies what he says, because he understands that the big shot.
but face the thread last night that you wanted to pass that contained the URL's from YouTube, where it arrogance? what I could learn something from these videos is highly alarming that leaves no time to find and would like me to believe that there are reporters willing to falsify the news?
that the consequences of Chernobyl are not true? The problems arising from uranium in France does not exist? What do you want to convince?
that there are no changes in the body of these kids / and fauna / flora ...?
you think everything is fake? people do not have anything better to do than do
investigations are false?
if false, then why a Russian doctor who reported statistics and the results were imprisoned and exiled?
obviously people decide to put their safety at risk to say crap? perhaps to warn humanity from atrocities and what you are trying to cover even after 24 years?
I was there in 1986 and I was 15 and lived the period of Chernobyl then was never seen anything like it in respect of such raw images on television, while on the Internet is right to pass, so people do not commit the same mistakes of 24 years ago.
Chernobyl is still deserted, and everything about that area is covered by secrecy and does not yet know well what the hell happened, but there have been 500,000 deaths and still very detailed information nbon you can have.
find insult in what I wrote and they are not responsible for any blasphemous or offensive to be told in a video put on YouTube and just because you're talking about blasphemy I could tell you that I can say without any problem and that is your problem, listen or not is a matter of taste, if not say no because I have to pass the thread, just say, regardless of the thread, maybe what I want to convey is' information is much more important for me is not it? But seeing as I'm told this thing about the profanity (which I have said so far and is dedicated precisely to that of which you speak, or curses and I went looking for the specific case, please read carefully and understand what you want say) then let me tell you to look
http://translate.google.it/translate?u=http://avvertenze.aduc.it/censura/comunicato/bestemmia%2Bgrande%2Bfratello%2Bbigotti%2Bitalia%2Balla_16994.php&sl=it&tl=en&hl=&ie=UTF-8
Big Brother blasphemy. Bigots of Italy to the rescue, but the Supreme Court from 'them wrong
January 22, 2010 14:38
July 29, 2010 at 11:05
However, Ferrari is not just red, there's also yellow or other colors is striking that only a false red, this is a matter of taste, but it's worse to believe that only red, teaching for good in the head anyone.
I think a little history of Alberto Sordi, who wanted to be a journalist and tried in every way to not let him pass the exam, despite having provided the correct information, especially the oral, when asked voter
Rivers and he denied saying that the paper angiography was outdated and that from n given the locations of rivers were changed, came out almost a case of the State, because even the Cartographic Institute, she knew the news, while a citizen could studying to pass the exam and to become a journalist for RAI.
Yes I'm talking about the film in which he has those teeth so big that they thought could put fear in Italian homes, not being able to fail in the end because everything was correct and because he had been denied mail delivery, he proved to have sent in advance.
Unfortunately, to talk and to deal with a thread, seems to be having to walk on hot coals, as he let in threads that are very questionable cases came to put political connotations of arrogance beyond the scope of sourcing including: solar, wind, geothermal instead of renewable fuels and uranium that there is none really little, or even for 60 years, then there will be, then who benefits to make these plants need a nuclear reactor?
In this case, a French multinational that seems to have monetary problems, and between an agreement with Berlusconi and Sarkozy, wants to build nuclear plants in Italy, against the opinion of the Italians, who at the time, by referendum, they said clearly that were opposed and central came dismantled.
Today we want to build new nuclear power plants, and in the meantime if you really correspond to reality, the energy demand can not be solved, for a nuclear plant to put in place it takes 12 years.
Anything that burns, it produces an n amount of dioxins, thus also the history of clean coal is a huge dance and I can explain the researcher Stefano Montanari.
Carlo Rubbia should know that there is no safe nuclear, see for example: Chinese Syndrome: China Syndrome with Michael Douglas, Jane Fonda, Jack Lemmon in 1979.
Let's be serious and say things that respond to the truth and not lies or government propaganda.
July 29, 2010 at 12:02
The "fair trade consumerism" in Paul
recommend it to Marchionne
for work and not a place!
In Serbia the right?
July 29, 2010 at 12:49
@ Paolo
As you can see the length of your comment and the large number of links the port in moderation manuale.Almeno far here has always worked well. 'There is no indication to different rules for te.
I you do not believe search will find old posts and complaints "friends of nuclear power" on their comments blocked and pending approval by various days
Then course everything was resolved.
No problem, nothing niente.
Here do not remove and / or stops anything but offensive in contrast to well known sites "green friends" ... ...
Greetings
July 29, 2010 at 13:15
maybe you were wrong, voevi write "The Communist fair trade."
If you feel Falcone Borsellino or would not agree with what you said or "recommend it to Marchionne.
Among its many him then? I add? someone with a sense of economic values, respect for water resources, for example in China are polluted by toxic waste disposal and disposal
the components of computers and the like.
500 million pieces per year going to pollute water resources.
Do you really want to recommend? test Sabina Guzzanti Caterina Guzzanti, Corrado Guzzanti, Naomi Klein, Michael Moore, Mark Achbar, Federico Rampini, Pekka Himanen, Richard Matthew Stallman, Wendy Goldman Rohm, Steven Levy, Glyn Moody, Edwin Black, Kevin David Mitnick, H. - C Schmid, M. Gutmann, Bruce Sterling, valve Raf Scelsi, Paul Mastrolilli Antonio Padellaro, Marco Travaglio, Gabriele Polo, Shake Edizioni Underground Press Altena new balance, Mountain Bike Action, QST, ARRL, IARU, CQ Electronic RadioKit, Giant, Scott, LaPierre, Fsfueurope.org Defectivebydesign.org fsf.org
I recommend to me a person who wants to close up the plants in 2013 in Termini Imerese? and then because the governments of the center bore DC and PSI, with the choice of investments in the South for the manufacture of robots, when they had the stalks through fishing and tourism.
they have taken the piss? I'd say yes, then I would expect a recommendation to people who have values and not against people who think only in the capital.
the real capital today is information, are no longer money.
July 29, 2010 at 13:22Comments Journal Staff
Hi paolo del bene,
the system of publication of the comments has no system of censorship and / or other evaluation before publication.
However, the system provides automatic (based on an algorithm) the installation "awaiting moderation" for those at risk spam comments, in which case you must wait for a "human" to physically intervene and provide deadlock.
This is why his comment of July 28, 2010 at 17:51 was not immediately public.
That's it.
He adds that this site \ blog is not in any way for or against nuclear, but tries to be a simple open space where you can discuss in cons of nuclear energy.
A place where everyone can bring their experience \ knowledge to share.
Greetings.
August 6, 2010 at 02:36
http://cinefotoart-giordanog.jimdo.com/curiosità-eco/incidenti-nucleari
THE LIST OF NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS
Recently I hear a lot of return to nuclear power.
But can you really consider it safe?
Who speaks so often we would live near a nuclear plant?
As history teaches, here is a list of nuclear accidents in the world (even in Italy of course).
March 10, 1956 - Mediterranean Sea. A B-47 bomber crashes in the Mediterranean carrying two capsules of fissile material for the production of nuclear bombs.
July 27, 1956 - Great Britain. A B-47 bomber in Britain sled on the track and goes to hit a warehouse containing six nuclear bombs.
October 7, 1957-Sellafield (UK) (INES 5).
In the Windscale nuclear complex in Britain, which produces plutonium for military purposes, a fire in a reactor core gas-graphite (GCR) generates a huge radioactive cloud.
The main materials are released radioactive isotopes of xenon, iodine, cesium and polonium.
The cloud across the whole of Europe.
Were formalized only 300 have died traced the incident (diseases, leukemia, cancer) but the figure could be underestimated.
September 1957 - Kyshtym (Soviet Union) (INES 6).
In a nuclear weapons factory in Urals, a tank containing radioactive waste takes fire and explodes, contaminating thousands ofsquare kilometers of land with a cloud of 20 million curies. The release of radioactivity outside occurs after a malfunction refrigeration system of a tank storage of fission products to high activities.
Are exposed to radiation around 270 thousand people. We estimate the consequences
accident more than 100 deaths.
January 3, 1961 - Idaho Falls (USA).
Following an accident at an experimental reactor of Idaho Falls United States, three technicians died.
July 4, 1961 - USSR. The release of radiation in a failure of a control system two reactors of a Soviet atomic submarine causes the death of the captain and seven members crew.
December 5, 1965 - Ryukyu Islands (Japan).
A Jet U.S. military A-4E carrying a B-43 hydrogen bomb slips into the sea from an aircraft carrier
U.S. close to the Japanese islands Ryukyu.
October 5, 1966 - Detroit (USA).
The core of a reactor Experimental located in a facility near Detroit overheats because of a fault system
cooling.
January 17, 1966 - Palomares (Spain).
A B-52 U.S. with four hydrogen bombs B-28 collides with a tanker during the refueling. The two crashed aircraft and three hydrogen bombs (H-bombs) fall near Palomares while the fourth fell into the sea.
The explosion of two of the three bombs, wetted soil, spreading detonate over a wide area plutonium and other radioactive material. In three months are collected 1,400 tons of land and vegetation that are carried in the radioactive USA. While the U.S. military are provided of protective clothing, Spaniards continue to live quietly and to cultivate land. A monitoring conducted in 1988 on 714 inhabitants has
revealed in 124 of them a concentration of plutonium in urine by far exceeding the levels normal.
March 10, 1968 - Pacific Ocean.
The submarine K-219 sinks into the Pacific. A board has three missiles and two nuclear torpedoes with nuclear warheads.
May 27, 1968 - Atlantic Ocean.
A submarine U.S. carrying two torpedoes warhead Nuclear sank in the Atlantic.
August 21, 1968 - Greenland.
A B-52 U.S. crashes in Greenland. Three bombs hydrogen that were on board exploding and 400 grams of plutonium-239 disperse environment. The area is then drained from more than 500 men sent from Denmark and from 200 U.S. military. In the twenty years later, 100 of Danes who had participated
intervention is ill with cancer and other serious diseases, including infertility.
October 17, 1969 - St. Laurent (France).
An error in procedures adopted for managing fuel causes a partial fusion reactor gas-cooled nuclear power.
April 12, 1970 - Atlantic Ocean.
The submarine Soviet K-8 sank in the Atlantic carrying two reactors and two torpedoes with nuclear warheads.
April 1973 - Hawaii (USA).
Radioactive leak submarine in the U.S. Guardfish Hawaii. Five seamen are contaminated by radiation.
1974 - Caspian Sea.
Media sources reported an explosion in an atomic plant Soviet Shevchenko, the Caspian Sea.
Winter 1974/75 - Leningrad (USSR).
A series of incident is reported during the winter of 1974 and 1975 at the Leningrad NPP in
Soviet Union. Three confirmed dead.
November 22, 1975 - Mediterranean Sea.
An aircraft carrier and Americans enter into a cruiser collision in the Mediterranean by the sea
agitated. As in other cases it is not established, but likely, the leakage of nuclear material in
Following the accident.
December 7, 1975 - Lubmin (Democratic Republic German).
A short circuit in the installation of Central Lubmin on the Baltic coast in Germany East, causing a partial melting reactor core.
March 28, 1979 - Three Mile Island (Harrisburg, USA) (INES 5).
Overheating of a reactor, after the collapse of a pump in the cooling system, causing partial core meltdown released into radioactive gas amounted to 15 thousand terabequerel (TBq). 3,500 people evacuated.
August 7, 1979 - Tennessee (USA).
The release of uranium enriched by a nuclear installation secret causes the contamination of more than 1,000 people. Are recorded in the population values of radioactivity up to five times higher normal.
August 1979 - Erwin (USA).
Over 1,000 people are contaminated as a result of a leak radioactive in a nuclear research center, until
then remained secret, Erwin, United States.
March 1981 - Tsuruga (Japan).
280 people are contaminated due to a leak radioactive wastes in the middle of Tsuruga in Japan. A month later, authorities report that 45 workers were exposed to radioactivity during operations for repair of the plant.
November 1983 - Sellafield (Great Britain).
Unloading liquid waste in the Irish Sea provoked a reaction from citizens and environmentalists who
call for the closure of the nuclear Sellafield in Britain.
August 10, 1985 - USSR.
An explosion destroys the Soviet atomic submarine Shkotovo-22: die ten crew members exposed to
radiation.
January 6, 1986 - Oklahoma (USA).
One worker dies and other 100 remain contaminated following an incident develops into a nuclear power plant in Oklahoma, USA.
April 26, 1986 - Chernobyl (Ukraine) (INES 7).
The absolute worst nuclear accident in information is received. Overheating causes core meltdown of the reactor explosion radioactive steam, which form a cloud representing a billion billion Becquerel disperses air. Hundreds of thousands of people, especially in nearby Belarus are forced to leave the contaminated territories. All of Europe is exposed to the radioactive cloud and for millions of
Europeans increases the risk of cancer and leukemia. There are still data official explicable by the deaths and final tragedy.
October 6, 1986 - Atlantic Ocean.
The K-219 submarine sank in the Atlantic with 34 tested nuclear edge.
February 1991 - Mihama (Japan).
The plant pours in 20 tons of sea water highly radioactive
March 24, 1992 - St. Petersburg (Russia).
Following loss of pressure in Sosnovy Bor near St. Petersburg, escapes and disperse into the atmosphere gases and iodine radioactive.
November 1992 - Forbach (France).
Severe nuclear accident due to contamination Radioactive three workers. The plant managers
They accused the following year did not prepared the safety measures provided.
February 13, 1993 - Sellafield (Great Britain).
Escape reprocessing of radioactive plant Sellafield. The maximum density of the radionuclides
Iodine is exceeded more than threefold.
February 17, 1993 - Barsebaeck (Denmark).
One of reactors is central Barsebaeck temporarily stopped due to leakage accidental release of radioactive steam.
April 1993 - Siberia (Russia).
A fire in the complex Tomsk-7 chemical strikes a tank uranium. There are about 1,000 acres of contaminated ground. The radioactive cloud is directed to areas uninhabited.
March 23, 1994 - Biblis (Germany).
Nuclear Biblis: a flaw in the primary circuit of a reactor exits highly contaminated liquid.
June 28, 1994 - Petropavlosk (Russia).
Escape radioactive material into the bay to Seldevaia due to the rupture of a deposit Petropavlosk.
September 1995 - Kola (Sea Barents).
The electricity of the Central Kola is separated for arrears and should be discarded systems cooling. Accident only touched, thanks intervention by the base commander.
November 1995 - Chernobyl (Ukraine) (INES 3).
Failure in the cooling system Case No. 1 reactor of the Chernobyl accident in which a radioactivity escapes and contaminates the workers engaged in maintenance.
December 8, 1995 - Monju (Japan).
Two tonnes of liquid sodium and other radioactive material escapes from a nuclear reactor prototype
Monju in Fukui Prefecture due to a malfunction of the cooling system. The plant consists of a breeder reactor fast neutron FBR.
February 1996 - Dimitrovgrad (Russian Federation).
A employee because the rupture valve safety of a reactor research center atomic Dimitrovgrad. Comes out of a cloud mainly containing radioactive nuclides manganese.
March 1997 - Tokaimura (Japan).
A fire and explosion in reactor nuclear reprocessing plant in Tokaimura contaminates at least 35 workers.
June 1997 - Arzamas (Russia).
An accident in research center in Arzamas door materials radioactive brink of a chain reaction. One
spread a radioactive cloud following which dies in charge of the experiment.
July 1997 - The Hague (France).
The town Hamburg complaint presence of radioactivity water discharged from the installation of the Channel French La Hague treatment. France denied, but the president of the Commission control resigns.
September 1997 - Urals (Russia).
Urals is up against a tractor and a truck carrying radioactive isotopes. Two containers leaking fluid
dangerous containing iridium 192 and cobalt 60. In developed is 25 times the radioactivity
upper limit.
May 1, 1998 - Swiss Alps authorities French discovered high levels of control Caesium-137 contamination in the Alps caused by the passage of ferrous from Eastern Europe.
September 30, 1999 - Tokaimura (Japan) (4 INES).
An accident in a factory of nuclear fuel triggers a chain reaction uncontrolled. Is satisfied that it is a
Human error: two workers have treated materials radioactive containers unfit. Three People
die instantly, while other 439, including 119 in seriously, are exposed to radiation.
Are hospitalized in 600 and 320 thousand residents evacuated the area.
October 4, 1999 - Wolsong (South Korea).
A leakage of water during heavy work Maintenance of Central Wolsong Case radiation exposure of 22 workers employed at the installation.
October 5, 1999 - Central Loviisa (Finland).
Reports a loss of hydrogen plant of Loviisa on the Finnish coast. Second technicians of the plant there was a danger and fire losses. The situation, according to employees, however, remained under control.
October 8, 1999 - Rokkasho (Japan).
A small amount of radioactive material leaking from A deposit of waste in Rokkasho in the prefecture
Japanese Aomori. The radiation coming two casks arrived by nuclear Ekushima.
October 20, 1999 - Superphenix (France).
A technical hitch delayed the dismantling of Superphenix of fast neutron reactor Creys-Malville (Isere), South-West France.
In the operation of unloading the reactor incident technical to a pulley for the extraction of fuel cartridges stop the unloading phase of radioactive material.
November 18, 1999 - Torness (Scotland).
An RAF Tornado to exercise fell into the sea opposite the Torness Nuclear Power Station in Scotland unless mile from the plant. Severe incident is touched by a whisker.
December 13, 1999 - Zaporozhe (Ukraine).
The first of the six Central Ukrainian nuclear reactors Zaporozhe is stopped for a malfunctioning
signs of excessive pressure.
January 5, 2000 - Blayais (France) (INES 2).
A storm causes an accident to the central of Blayais in the Gironde, where two of the four reactors
are stopped. The water floods some local the central damaged pumps and circuits important.
January 27, 2000 - Japan.
An accident at a installation to reprocess uranium Japan causing radiation levels 15 times higher
standard in a range of about 1.2 miles. Local officials report that at least 21 people been exposed to radiation.
February 15, 2000 - Indian Point (USA).
A small amount of radioactive steam from escaping Indian Point 2 reactor near the town of Buchanan on the Hudson River, a town about 70 miles from New York. The loss of radioactive gas forced the company operating the plant close the station and declare a state of alert. The loss is approximately half a cubic meter of vapors radioactive.
April 10, 2003 - Paks (Hungary) (INES 3).
The unit number 2 of the Paks nuclear site (Consisting of four reactors is the only Hungary 115 km from Budapest) undergoes the overheating and destruction of thirty bars highly radioactive fuel. Only a
complex intervention averts the cooling hazard nuclear explosion, with limited but uncontrolled
serious consequences for the area around Paks.
October 17, 2003 - Archipelago of La Maddalena (Italy).
Touched accident nuclear submarine American Hartford runs aground on the shoals of the monks to
few miles from the base of La Maddalena where only the ability of the commander is able to bring
port in the vehicle damaged. The dismissal of some military suggests that the risk is not over
it was laughable.
August 9, 2004 - Mihama (Japan). In reactor number 3
plant in Mihama, 350 km west of Tokyo, causing a hole to escape high pressure steam which reaches 270 degrees causing four deaths among the workers. Other seven hospital workers are dying.
It isthe most tragic incident in the history of nuclear Japan. The station is closed.
August 9, 2004 - Shimane (Japan).
A fire in the field of waste disposal in a plant in Shimane Prefecture.
August 9, 2004 - Ekushima-Daini (Japan).
The plant is stopped for a loss of water from generator.
April 2005 - Sellafield (Great Britain).
It is reported the release of over 83 thousand liters liquid half-life in 10 months due to a crack in
and conducted a series of technical errors.
May 2006 - Enea Casaccia Laboratories (Italy).
Leakage of plutonium allowed only four months later, that has contaminated six people involved in
decommissioning.
May 2006 - Mihama (Japan).
Another accident leakage of 400 gallons of radioactive water Mihama Nuclear Power Station in the former.
July 26, 2006 - Oskarshamn (Sweden) (INES 2).
Short circuit in the electrical installation of central 250 km south of Stockholm where two of the four backup generators are not were able to ignite. Are tested every nuclear power plants in the country and that of Forsmark is turned off.
October 7, 2006 - Kozlodui (Bulgaria).
Is intercepted a radioactivity level twenty times permissible limits and verification lead to discovering
a leak in a pipe at high pressure. The Central, which is located near the Danube, escapes to
a serious failure. According to the press the local management tries to hide what happened and to minimize the ratio Agency
national Atomic Energy Agency.
June 28, 2007 - Kruemmel (Germany).
A fire in nuclear Krummel, in northern Germany near Hamburg. Flames reach the structure that houses the reactor and it is necessary to stop the activities of the plant. In a few months failures also occur in
central Forsmark, Ringhals and Brunsbuttel. According to the 2006 report of the Federal Ministry
Environment Kruemmel plant is the most subject to minor incidents between the 17 stations.
According to plans for producing nuclear power, set in a Act 2002, the reactor should be shut down as
later in 2015.
July 16, 2007 - Kashiwazaki (Japan).
The Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Station, the most largest in the world that supplies electricity to 20 million inhabitants, is closed Following damage caused by the earthquake. The Agency
Japanese control of nuclear activities admits a series of radioactive leaks from the plant, but
says that these iodine leaked from a drain valve. The Director General of the IAEA,
Mohammed ElBaradei, said the earthquake " was stronger than that for which the plant was
designed. The earthquake causes a large fire in an electrical transformer, the leakage of
1,200 liters of radioactive water flowing Sea of Japan and fifty other accidents. There are fears that the earthquake fault active steps just below the middle.
Lorenzo Riva writes:
August 6, 2010 at 19:23
ilmessaggero.it / home_blog.php? blg = P & idb = 90 = 10 & idaut
More trivially, even at home it all happen colors. And not just that women kill by men (the reverse happens, but rarely), but its domestic accidents. According to ISTAT it More die from falling ladder to clean the glass and construction sites. According to available data ultiimi Istat, published in 2001, taking place in Italy every year 3 million 672 thousand accidents in the home of 8000 where the average mortal. There are about 7000 deaths on the road and about 1300 deaths in the workplace.
The kitchen is the place where the most household accidents, however, do not leave not free men. It is there that occurs 58% Accident women and 31% of the men. Stairs and ladders internal and external causes accidents in 9.3% of cases among women and 9.8% of cases among men. According to latest estimates Inail (2006 figures) slips, trips and falls cause 80% of accidents, cuts and fire are the result of an Another 9% of accidents. Fractures account for 70% lesions detected in accidents that occur
in the home, burns, wounds and injuries are caused in 12% of cases.
It has already been written on this forum until Grade 3 are not accidents. 4 are from accidents.
In twenty years only on Italian roads are dead about 140,000 people including 125,000 and 450,000 injuries with damage permanent and sometimes serious.
Mr. paolo del bene he hurts a lot when using the car because the statistical possibility that may
befall something is high.
If he wants zero risk does not yet unborn.
To say that the statistical margin of the 1,300 deaths Accidents at work are not accurate because the dead on direct job while others are 650 650 die in road accidents to move from home to workplace and vice versa.
Therefore, I suggest not going to work right whether to use the car.
Paolo writes of the property:
August 6, 2010 at 21:23
because instead of using metaphors, does not say really what he thinks or she is prone to nuclear and
So as I said on another occasion, because do not put a nuclear power in your own home?
he believes that there are no consequences, well, I hope you remain contaminated by these causes and effect, so it makes account of what he said about me.
I move with my bike (SCOTT Ransom 40) and I do not see why I should close within four sheets that
summer become a crematorium, i prefeer the public transport (train, subway, bus).
there is no reason why in Rome, must move with a car, you do the kilometers by car, with
stress ... I am not sure what I am doing 3 weeks 285 km.
certainly have been stopped 2 weeks due to a slight reported knee contusion, but even when I
hurt during the other days I did not of 20-27 or even 34 km per day.
now that bikes are returned, do 8 km in a short time I certainly recall, here in the next 20 days, but
then will leave for abroad.
As to the hurting in the kitchen, of course we must get their commitment, I could understand falling from a chair or from a ladder or tripping over a carpet, but also this is very remote.
there are more killers in cars, motorcycles, motorbikes, trucks, which inattentive cyclists, but this certainly can not see me to say that from 1956 to 2007, are completely random and that as happens in other people's houses, then we must be calm, because the remote possibility that occurs is close to 0.
As you may have the most accidents on their refrigeration equipment and nuclear power plants French.
also remember that in 1987 citizens ITALIAN (not ITALIAN know if she is or not), have spoken with
Referendum against the adoption of nuclear power plants.
I come to say that over 23 years research has been going on nuclear, because it was blocked
with voting by citizens, then there is no safe nuclear.
Furthermore, as you well know, the adoption of nuclear Nuclear does not solve the problem of electricity, if there was just a real need.
Only the region of Tuscany with electricity produces, could go ahead with the rest of Italy
So it speaks volumes about the real needs.
is an agreement between Sarkozy and Berlusconi, to revive nuclear and call in those companies active on Nuclear in France because are next to closing ( precisely for the incidents that occurred in all these years).
I'm sorry that you are misinformed about the Italian energy needs, but it would be better
documented before the attack and wish for death, because metaphorically, these are the words that you have pronounced or even telling me that I should content with what I handed the company and not
I fight for change, because so much is the political design.
if these are the ideals, if they keep tight, why do not you do for me.
the construction of a nuclear power plant requires 12 years and does not resolve soon, as I said before,
energy needs.
nuclear power plants then being built with funds public areas and TOP SECRET, and there is no
insurance, forming a central guarantee nuclear explosion in the event.
As will be seen from videos, Chernobyl is a plain desolate, uninhabited by anyone and now I come to
let me say that propaganda is the term [Community] ?
would be incredible to deny the obvious, however if you really feel safe, the port of weight
Central Montalto di Castro, inside the reactor, then see if you still feel safe.
Paolo writes of the property:
August 6, 2010 at 21:42
http://forum.radicali.it/content/renzo-riva-avanti
Thu, 25/02/2010 - 21:26
a.licheri says:
The site says that the "movement of opinion" are converged even former club presidents Forza Italy
disappointed by the party. A bit 'nostalgic Berlusconi But it should, given that "the association has
constituted by deed Studio Popes of 9/5/2005.
I see among you there is Antonio Zichichi.
There is however your friend Franco Battaglia. The reason maybe I know.
In a bit 'will arrive on a call:
Franco Battaglia: Renzo, I combine? You made me many accolades for my work in favor of OGM, they
you also put on the forum of the radicals, and now joins an association that speaks of OGM ?
Lorenzo Riva: But we like to favor nuclear power as him ... There is also Antonio Zichichi and Vincenzo Romanello.
as. Franco Battaglia: No, thanks. I'm fine in Galileo2001
Lorenzo Riva writes:
August 6, 2010 at 22:35
Ask staff to store nuclear
an official warning
Mr. paolo del bene
for obvious intimidation,
Tonight at 21:49 on my phone I get a call from someone who has disguised his number.
Answer and, wonder of wonders, a person of my identity accertatasi qualifies for paolo del bene.
I do not know what was the psychophysical state of the person who was touted for the paolo well but I only know that I promised that we will meet in the appropriate forums.
Probably was shaken from my thoughts on accident statistics and my recommendations for data from its endanger his person by unsafe behaviors and choices.
Propose as the appropriate forum for our meeting the Bar (brothel) Casanova Villach (A)
http://www.qype.it/place/537856-Casanova-Bar-Villach
or
"La Cocotte" always in Villach.
lacocotte.at / villach_maedchen.php? sprache = en & kat = Villach
or another of his choice but not in Italy because even in the brothels do not show the professionalism and seriousness necessary to recognize that he does not want the next Italian nuclear.
Lorenzo Riva
Street Avilla, 12 / 1
33030 Buja - UD
renzoslabar@yahoo.it
+39.349.3464656
Lorenzo Riva writes:
August 6, 2010 at 22:43
About imaginary carnage
21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles_2010/Chernobyl_repopulat ...
Paolo writes of the property:
August 7, 2010 at 03:27
I must point out that for his part I was bored on the internet, insulted on the internet and by phone, so there is little to dispute.
still can not store nuclear know that we said and the significance of a telephone conversation ra two people, has no legal value if not registered and deposited with a lawyer and I think that would even Difficulty will file it in court as evidence because no has no legal value.
there are insults on my part, for its part there are no threats, but only a notice that the supervision to me.
there are insults on my part, and I might as well say that talking to friends who are in the PR and are still trying to figure out who are you, how is possible that you are favorable to nuclear power, when within the PR does not have reacted favorably nuclear.
There are neither threats, nor insult on my part, I just said in practice that should not address more the word on the web and it is useless to go under the skirt to cover store nuclear, hoping to take his defense, is no longer a child, who goes in search of a parent who take up his defense.
Stock nuclear is not his lawyer or his mother and father know what she told me and I told a few seconds of conversation and as an adult, instead of showing a minimum of common sense has preferred to throw the phone down .
I do not think these are the values that were given.
I have no interest in meeting you anywhere and having to explain anything, she shows all this verve for nuclear not me! I do not want that in my country go back to nuclear power (the Italians in 1987 showed their disagreement through a referendum).
Berlusconi, Sarkozy neither you can decide against the popular consensus and finally I say, thought that there are places where nuclear waste disposal? decided to put them under the carpet of his house?