no to the nuke possible spam from the admin sys

I think there is an interest to close this blog, why am I talking about something that Silvio Berlusconi wants to do I have emphasized, any risks, using the news of Italian newspapers and translated into English with the translator of google

in the past days the government approved a law called D'Alia, this law takes the name from the person that is in the UDC Union Democratic Christian of Center, interested with Silvio Berlusconi to approve a law, to put the gag to internet as you can see from the movie.


this is the text of the movie:

A. Gilioli: I wanted to talk about this amendment: First, explain the
purpose and usefulness.

D'Alia: The amendment to Article 50 introduces a security package, which allows the Minister of the Interior, upon notice of the court which is a crime of incitement to criminal defense or offense, gives the Ministry of Interior the power to require that providers of Internet connectivity to the network using the tools of filtering with respect to those sites or social network that contain, say, statements and anything else related to these cases of crime.

That is, it's a rule that serves to begin to intervene in the regulation of the Internet and this comes mainly from events that focused on Facebook, the appearance on the social network of groups inneggianti with Riina, Provenzano, the Red Brigades and so on.

And since there is no tool in making an immediate action if it deems such a course of crime, that is, if the judiciary is investigating, the Minister of Interior is involved with a purely precautionary in nature that serves to avoid that there is a proliferation of these sites or these illegal events on the network.

Of course, all this takes place with the possibility of recourse to the court by interested parties, but through a kind of contradictory with the operators of sites to which a notice is served to obscure or delete those parts which are contrary to the positions mentioned.

A. Gilioli: But, Senator, let me interrupt you.

This claim is made that it is this: I read that right its amendment, no one speaks to cancel the parties, but to obscure the site.

Then they say: if there is a group on facebook that calls for Provenzano rather than other things, the effect of his amendment would delete the page, but obscure the entire site.

D'Alia: But excuse me: If the site does not pay to remove these individuals from the site, it is right that the site is obscured.

The Ministry warns the operator, the operator then has two options: either comply and then delete the site group or not comply.

If you do not comply it is an accomplice of those who praise Riina and Provenzano is therefore right that is obscured.

A. Gilioli: In YouTube, for example, there are several videos that may fall, perhaps, within the type that you mentioned.

If YouTube does not delete the video is obscured the YouTube?

D'Alia: I will, of course.

A. Gilioli: Ancora another case ...

D'Alia: Let me give an example: if on a YouTube video comes out, as it happened, and moreover there were several controversies, in which four boys beat their contemporary disabile however, in this case we represent the presence of a crime is not that there is an apology: there is the direct or playing a film in which it is committing a criminal offense is just a site that is maintained ?

I think not.

A. Gilioli: Another case: there is a debate online, on sites in the forums.

Among users of the forum may be that there is also that insults or threatens you.

She believes this is a type ...

D'Alia: If someone threatens me, the threat in reality or on the internet is always a crime.

A. Gilioli: Here are another kind: I am allegedly the author of a blog.

Inside some of my blog, one of the commentators on my blog, I insult, threat.

I who am the blog master and then I think it is fair to leave my blog open to each entry, including those that threaten me, and insult me, do not I hide these items.

Even in this case it corresponds to the type?

D'Alia: Well, come that all those assumptions are set out under the Criminal Code crimes of incitement to murder or to disobey the laws.

The crimes of apology of crime, which are provided by the Criminal Code or other provisions.

These are all assumptions that are brought in this case illegal, who are already penalized in the Penal Code and thus need to be sanctioned in all their manifestations.

It is not that changes if I make a stencils to say that Riina ...

A. Gilioli: Excuse me Senator, we're talking about comments to a blog ...

D'Alia: Well, the comments to a blog is not that different: if in a comment to a blog I would say that the Red Brigades have done well to kill Moro, this is called apology of crime.

What I do on the blog, with a telegram, a card, with a press release does not change:

Always it comes to crime and should be pursued, and should be pursued if the one who makes it an accomplice by publishing these disgraceful, including whether it is an operator of the Internet both to be clear.

I think in this way.

A. Gilioli: Senta senator: you are a frequenter of the network?

D'Alia: Yes

A. Gilioli: On facebook there's going?

D'Alia: No, I go on facebook indigna just because I see on that site that you censurino mothers who breastfeed their children because it is considered an aesthetically offensive, unsightly, and then allow the various groups, such as "Homage to Cutolo, who is a relative of pentiti infamous confidants and please do not subscribe to this site dedicated to Cutolo.

I do not go there because this site that censure the mothers, as also correctly states Article 21, and allows these disgraceful is an unworthy, from my point of view.

With all due respect to those who enter.

A. Gilioli: Are you aware that if you close in YouTube and Facebook are worse in Burma ?

D'Alia: Look, I do not have to close or Facebook or YouTube: I am because Facebook and YouTube respect the victims of the Mafia, terrorism and rapes.

A. Gilioli: And if you do not comply ?

D'Alia: If you do not meet the can not have respect for the rule.

A. Gilioli: So are closed.

D'Alia: It 'obvious.

i invite you, if you got firefox to download the add-ons to download the movies in *.flv, that normally is not possible to download, why are converted in flash video. and many of these movies are on youtube. the same movie that is here, is available on youtube

from Blogger no-reply@google.com
to no.to.the.nuke@gmail.com
date 25 February 2009 12:20
subject http://no-to-the-nuke.blogspot.com/ - ACTION NECESSARY
mailed-by blogger.bounces.google.com
Signed by google.com

no to the nuke possible spam from the admin sys

Hello,

Your blog at: http://no-to-the-nuke.blogspot.com/ was identified as a potential spam blog.

If you will not be reviewed, your blog will be eliminated between 20 days and during this time your readers will see a warning page. After receiving your request, review your blog and unlock it within two working days. When you have examined and have determined that your blog is not spam, the blog will be unlocked and the message in your Blogger dashboard will no longer appear. If your blog is not your property you must not do anything. Any other blog you own will not be affected.

We note the spam through an automatic classifier. Automatic detection of spam is not always exact and sometimes a blog like yours is flagged incorrectly. We apologize for the error. Using this system, however, we can devote more resources to storage, bandwidth and technical assistance to bloggers like you instead of to spammers.

Thank you for your understanding and your help in our efforts against spam.

Sincerely,

The Blogger Team

P.S. One last reminder: The blog will be deleted within 20 days if you do not ask for the exam.

no to the nuke

South Texas nuke challenge deadline nears http://www.sacurrent.com/blog/queblog.asp?perm=69504


Refueling at STNP: Is it time to double our pleasure? (DOE courtesy pic)


Greg Harman
gharman@sacurrent.com

When the phone book is distributed in Bay City, there are two fluorescent pages inside: one to inform emergency responders that you have evacuated because of a meltdown at the nearby South Texas Nuclear Project, another to say you need help evacuating because of a meltdown at the nearby South Texas Nuclear Project.

So far Bay City resident Susan Dancer hasn’t had cause to hang either of those pages, but neither has she or any of her neighbors ever received the potassium iodide pills federal law requires be distributed to those living in the shadow of nuclear power plants.

Providing that possibly life-saving precaution would be bad PR, she said. (As is this promo shot from Senator Hutchison's website, I might add.)

But, as the window is closing for nuke opponents to launch a formal challenge to CPS Energy's license application, that oversight isn’t the only reason Dancer, founder of the South Texas Association for Responsible Energy, is opposing the proposed doubling of the nuke complex.

There's unaddressed poverty to consider, the cost of tax abatements, and potential for disaster.

Listen in on our conversation:

Opponents of the plan now have two months to file formal opposition to the expansion plans.

Here’s what that camp wrote in a press release shipped out earlier today:

“CPS Energy has been stealthily and irresponsibly getting San Antonio deeper and deeper into this nuclear boondoggle, which is already raising our utility rates,” said Cindy Weehler of the Consumers’ Energy Coalition.

“There are cleaner, more affordable ways to generate electricity. Energy efficiency should be prioritized, not put on a back burner. With the economic downturn, we shouldn’t generate power that’s not needed. San Antonio has reduced energy use by 16% over the past two years. Why should we even consider antiquated reactors that could cost $17.5 billion and would leave radioactive waste for generations to come?”

“The streamlined combined construction and operating license process is designed to cut citizens out and limit public involvement. Safety concerns are taking a backseat to cost-cutting measures and the public doesn’t even know it yet” said Karen Hadden, Executive Director of the Sustainable Energy and Economic Development (SEED) Coalition.

Nuclear opponents point out the troubled history of existing STP Units 1 & 2, reactors which ran six times over budget and were eight years late coming online. This sordid history includes harassment and illegal firing of employees who lodged safety complaints, theft of materials, subcontractor price-fixing schemes, and falsification of quality assurance/quality control reports.

Before either unit was in operation The Austin Light newspaper reported on February 17, 1988, “There are currently more than 650 allegations concerning safety, costs and criminal activities brought by people who have worked on the project.” NRC Region IV became a target for a US Senate committee investigation for “corrupt” oversight of construction practices at STNP and Comanche Peak, another Brown and Root project. Sen. John Glenn said the agency is “more lapdog than watchdog.”

STPNOC includes NRG and CPS Energy, the municipal utility in San Antonio. Austin Energy, a partner in existing reactors at the site, has declined to participate in the proposed expansion.

An indefinite suspension of the license hearing was obtained through a petition SEED Coalition filed last year, based on the incomplete nature of the application. That suspension has now ended with the notice issued today by the NRC on the Federal Register regarding the public's opportunity to request participation in the hearing regarding the South Texas Project COL. The deadline for filing a request to participate is April 21. Citizens must develop their contentions, their legal case, during this extremely short time period, despite the fact that further revisions of the application are still anticipated.

The federal register notice along with information regarding the history of the existing ST(N)P reactors will also be posted at www.NukeFreeTexas.org.


The NRC writes:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission today announced the opportunity to participate in the hearing on a Combined License (COL) application for two new reactors at the South Texas Project site near Bay City, Texas.

NRG Energy and South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company submitted the COL application and associated information Sept. 20, 2007, and updated the application on Jan. 31, 2008, and Sept. 24, 2008. The application seeks approval to build and operate two Advanced Boiling Water Reactors (ABWR) at the site, approximately 12 miles southwest of Bay City. The NRC certified the ABWR design in 1997, and the design is currently in use overseas. The application (minus proprietary or security-related details), is available on the NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/col/south-texas-project.html.

The NRC staff determined in November 2007 that the application contained sufficient information for the agency to formally “docket,” or file, the application and begin its technical review. Much of the review was suspended in January 2008, following the applicants’ decision to change reactor vendors, and the application’s Sept. 24, 2008, revision reflected that change. The staff has determined the updated application is sufficient to restart review activities. Restarting the application’s review does not preclude additional requests for information as the review proceeds; nor does it indicate whether the Commission will issue the license. The docket numbers established for this application are 52-012 and 52-013.

The NRC has issued in the Federal Register a notice of opportunity to intervene in the proceeding on the application, and the deadline for requesting a hearing is April 21. Petitions may be filed by anyone whose interest may be affected by the proposed license, who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding, and who meets criteria set out in the NRC’s regulations. Background information regarding the hearing process was provided by NRC staff to members of the public during a June 2007 public information session in Bay City.

A petition to intervene must be electronically submitted in a timely manner to the NRC's Electronic Information Exchange (EIE) system. The petition to intervene must be filed in accordance with the NRC's E-Filing Rule that appeared in the Federal Register on Aug. 28, 2007. Additional guidance and instructions regarding electronic submissions to the NRC EIE system are available on the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html.

Detailed information about the new reactor licensing process can be found on the NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors.html.


The board of CPS Energy has invested $266 million in what officials have termed site review and design process for the STNP expansion and another $10 million to “explore” other nuclear options.

While STNP partner Austin Energy decided not to participate in the expansion plan due to financial uncertainty and concern about the waste the project would generate. In a nod to economic uncertainties, the board of CPS announced they will delay a final decision until the fall.


Posted by gharman on 2/24/2009 10:27:59 PM

no to the nuke

NUCLEAR ENERGY: GREENPEACE, ITALY-FRANCE AGREEMENT IN FAVOR OF SARKOZY


(ASCA) - Roma, 24 Feb - According to Greenpeace, the agreement signed today between Italy and France on nuclear power and 'to the benefit of Sarkozy, who is trying to maintain the French nuclear industry,''but does not offer all' Italia no guarantee of greater energy independence - technology and fuel come from abroad - and 'even against European targets short-term''.

The government continues to talk about nuclear power, but has just signed binding agreements in Europe to reach a share of 35 per cent of electricity from renewable sources to 2020.

Nuclear steal 'resources to the development of renewables, now subject to 16per cent, and the result could be a new infringement procedure before the European court.

''Italy has already 'lost train of nuclear power 30 years ago, now seeks to miss that for the clean energy of the future return on a dirty and dangerous technology that has never solved any of their problems'', says Francis German, Head Climate and Energy Campaign, Greenpeace.

Nuclear power has not solved any of the problems, from the safety of nuclear intrinsic to nuclear proliferation.

Even doubling the current number of reactors, which would speed the depletion of resources of uranium found that, at current levels, not exceeding fifty years, the contribution of nuclear energy to reduce emissions would be marginal, not more than five percent .

With investments in more efficient end-use energy efficiency, the effect of reducing emissions would be up to seven times higher.

The nuclear lobby''- argues Onufrio Joseph, director of Greenpeace - to avoid a crisis linked to the marginalization of this technology that in liberalized markets, as in the U.S., and 'substantially firm for 30 years.

The only investment is related to the maintenance and repowering of old plants''.

For the French EPR technology, there are only two sites: one in Finland and one in France, no more work.

In Finland, the actual costs in half 'of the building have already' passed 50 percent of the budget.

The authorities' Finnish nuclear safety in 2100 found no compliance 'during the construction.

President Sarkozy, in the absence of new orders, announced that France, that 'the state, ask' on AREVA - society 'almost entirely public - to build a second EPR reactor in France.

An implicit proof that nuclear power and the market are not compatible: a sort reactors should not be a state. Nuclear power''- Onufrio complaint - and 'an expensive, risky and based on a resource, uranium, very limited.

An evil choice that serves only a few interests of a sector that the market has already 'rejected''.

Italian URL
NUCLEARE__GREENPEACE__ACCORDO_ITALIA-FRANCIA_A_VANTAGGIO_DI_SARKOZY-811039-ORA-.html">http://www.asca.it/news-NUCLEARE__GREENPEACE__ACCORDO_ITALIA-FRANCIA_A_VANTAGGIO_DI_SARKOZY-811039-ORA-.html

English URL
http://translate.google.it/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.asca.it%2Fnews-NUCLEARE__GREENPEACE__ACCORDO_ITALIA-FRANCIA_A_VANTAGGIO_DI_SARKOZY-811039-ORA-.html&sl=it&tl=en&hl=it&ie=UTF-8">http://translate.google.it/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.asca.it%2Fnews-NUCLEARE__GREENPEACE__ACCORDO_ITALIA-FRANCIA_A_VANTAGGIO_DI_SARKOZY-811039-ORA-.html&sl=it&tl=en&hl=it&ie=UTF-8

no to the nuke

Enel: with Edf jv joint development for nuclear power EPR (RCO)

Company-led Enel Italy over 4 plants. The first from 2020

(Il Sole 24 Ore Radiocor) - Rome, Feb. 24 - Enel and Edf signed a memorandum of understanding with which undertake to form a joint venture that will be responsible for the development of feasibility studies' for the creation of a united 'generation EPR nuclear power.

In Italy and 'provided for the construction of 4 units' third generation, the first operation on a commercial no later than 2020.

Complete Works' study and took the necessary investment decisions, it is stated in a note, and 'provided for the establishment of companies' ad hoc for the Construction, property 'and putting into operation of each units' generation EPR nuclear power, which Enel will have 'a majority stake in the property 'of the plant and withdrawal of energy and leadership in the plants.

It 'also the opening of the property' a third with Enel for the maintenance of the majority and Edf
of society '.

Com-Zam-MLP-Y -

(Radiocor) 24-02-09 14:44:47 (0207) ene, 3 news NNNN

Italian URL http://www.tgfin.mediaset.it/tgfin/ultimissima.shtml?nRC_24.02.2009_14.44_20754460

English URL http://translate.google.it/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tgfin.mediaset.it%2Ftgfin%2Fultimissima.shtml%3FnRC_24.02.2009_14.44_20754460&sl=it&tl=en&hl=it&ie=UTF-8

no to the nuke

Legambiente: "the question of nuclear and security '

'Agreement, which agrees only to France »

PD and IDV against nuclear: "Berlusconi report in Parliament. Udc:" Well, lower energy costs »

MILAN - The agreement on nuclear energy signed by Berlusconi and Sarkozy do not like the opposition so that the Pd asks the Government to report to Parliament, which "has not yet voted on any measure in this direction - said Andrea Lulli, parent committee of Production .

We are also concerned about the choice that seems to emerge: the French technology in fact is likely to cut off the Italian system and build a dependence on France. "










Ermete Realacci (Lapresse)

According Ermete Realacci (Pd) 'Sarkozy tip on Italian public funds to support the French nuclear industry.

The current nuclear power is not competitive in Western countries and it is necessary to strengthen research on the fourth generation which reduces the risks, the production of waste, breaks the chain of nuclear proliferation. "

"The government signed an agreement with France on nuclear agrees that only the French and is losing time and opportunities to revitalize the field of renewable energies and energy saving" attacca Francesco Ferrante, of the national Ecodem (Pd), talking about ' yet another gift, after the Alitalia affair, cousins to the French. "

ITALY OF VALUES AND UDC - For Italy of Values, speaks with Senator Felice Belisario, "Berlusconi signed the agreements without Parliament has yet adopted the laws of reference.

Linked to the Financial expected the birth of the Agency for Nuclear Safety and a number of interventions to promote the implementation of new systems, but is still under discussion in the Senate.

Perhaps this is meant to be anticipating a spot propaganda, however, provides that an expenditure of 3 to 4 billion euros and the likely activation of the first center in 2020 without having resolved the problems of prior storage of nuclear waste.

" The only item out of the leadership of the choir.

"We are for nuclear power, we were in the election campaign and we are still today" - said Pier Ferdinando Casini -.

We support the government for all the concrete actions that will decide.

" Mauro Liberia, leader in the House Environment Committee: "

Italy must soon return to take advantage of nuclear power, the only way to truly reduce energy costs for households and businesses."

LEGAMBIENTE - Vittorio Cogliati Dezza, president of Legambiente, speaks of "dangerous and shortsighted agreement.

Why are all the international studies show that nuclear power is the source of energy more expensive and because the question of waste and safety.

" Dezza second, "the nuclear scenario is a prospect that Italy is in full economic crisis, probably can not afford.

The costs of central Finnish Olkiluoto have risen almost 50%, from 3.2 billion provided for the current 4.5.

In the WWF Italy will employee "not only in terms of energy sources, but also from technology through an agreement that is not convenient for the times, does not agree on economic grounds, not because it Co2 emissions.

To pay, in every sense, will be the citizen-taxpayers.

" Italy, as the WWF, has no reserves of uranium - mostly concentrated in Australia and Kazakhstan - and in quantities just sufficient to feed the existing 440 reactors for 40-50 years.

Thus, the new power supply would have problems and you will arrive late. According to Greenpeace, "the agreement is to the benefit of Sarkozy, who is trying to maintain the French nuclear industry.

Italy does not offer any guarantee of greater energy independence and it is indeed against European targets for the short term.

The government continues to talk about nuclear power and has just signed binding agreements in Europe to reach a share of 35% of electricity from renewable sources to 2020.

Nuclear divert resources to the development of renewables, now subject to 16%, and the result could be a new infringement procedure before the European court. "

VERDI - Very critical also the spokesman of the Greens, Grazia Francescato: "The Berlusconi government on nuclear energy continues to take fireflies for lanterns and the risk is that to pay for his errors of assessment are the citizens, as has happened to Alitalia.

This type of energy, says, "it is very costly both economically and socially, and continues to be dangerous both in terms of radioactivity that proliferation."

Francescato explains that "it is not true that nuclear energy will avoid the risks to energy security of our country.

There are risks to health and the environment related to radioactivity, and no one among the many supporters of nuclear energy tells us what it means to make nuclear waste that nobody in the world still managed to dispose of.

The choice of the Berlusconi government could have disastrous effects on energy efficiency and renewable upon which our country, unfortunately, have stopped investing.

" Paolo Cento said that the Greens are ready 'to consider all political action and struggle, including the referendum. "

Schifani and FRATTINI In the majority, is the chairman of the Senate Renato Schifani agreement to defend the Italian-French:

"Depending on other countries for energy is dangerous and disturbing and it is good to achieve nuclear power in Italy in complete safety."

The Economic Development Undersecretary Adolfo Urso said that Italy will develop projects for both nuclear energy and renewable energy, "so as to reduce dependence on energy from abroad, reduce energy costs and impact on negative 'environment.

Nuclear power and renewables must go hand in hand.

" Foreign Minister Franco Frattini told Sky TG24 that "in the coming years we will be laying the foundation stone of a nuclear clean and safe in Italy.

Nuclear power is an important source of energy supply to Italy. "

24 February 2009

Italian URL http://www.corriere.it/politica/09_febbraio_24/nucleare_accordo_italia_francia_reazioni_d62d5776-0279-11de-adb7-00144f02aabc.shtml

English URL http://translate.google.it/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.corriere.it%2Fpolitica%2F09_febbraio_24%2Fnucleare_accordo_italia_francia_reazioni_d62d5776-0279-11de-adb7-00144f02aabc.shtml&sl=it&tl=en&hl=it&ie=UTF-8

no to the nuke

Nuclear: Enel-EDF, four in central Italy

(ANSA)-ROMA, 24 FEB-EDF and Enel agree to develop and bring into operation in Italy at least 4 nuclear advanced third-generation EPR type.

The commitment and 'to give effect to the first united' English no later than 2020. E 'as expected the agreement between Enel and EDF on Development of nuclear power in Italy, signed in Rome today.

The first and 'under construction in Flamanville in Normandy and the participation of Enel with a share of 12.5%.

24 February 2009

Italian URL http://www.unita.it/newsansa/19505/nucleare_eneledf_quattro_centrali_in_italia

English URL http://translate.google.it/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.unita.it%2Fnewsansa%2F19505%2Fnucleare_eneledf_quattro_centrali_in_italia&sl=it&tl=en&hl=it&ie=UTF-8

no to the nuke

Berlusconi-Sarkozy: the agreement is total. Starting from the atom

vasco_pirri_ardizzone Tuesday, 24 February 2009

Silvio Berlusconi and Nicolas Sarkozy have agreed on everything: on the nuclear infrastructure on European policy (which should be changed), on international politics and even the victory of Ugo Cappellacci in Sardinia.

But remains a great divide and unbreakable ... cooking.

So much so that Sarkozy during the press conference with his friend Silvia "exclaimed:

" The real problem in Italy is that you sit at the table after 14:30. "

Apart from the table, which has always divide our country by transalpine cousins, so the tune is almost totally the Council President Silvio Berlusconi and French President Nicolas Sarkozy on the topics addressed today by the bilateral summit between Italy and France at the Villa Madama.

During the talks Sarko has made compliments to Cavaliere: 'It is fortunate that you are in politics for 15 years.

And it is good that you are a friend of Putin, because I do not know what you are told, but have slowed the escalation of the crisis between Georgia and Russia.

" Before you eat together, in Splendia Villa Madama, the two have done a press conference with the atom as an aperitif, "We must wake up - said Berlusconi - and build nuclear power plants too.

And thanks to the know how of French friends years and save money. "

Together - and it can only make noise - the two leaders also agreed on the critical rules of operation of the EU. "The rules of the EU are to be changed because, said the Italian premier in private, are of the last century and unfit to face the economic crisis."

Speaking of the crisis has Berlusconi reiterated that Italian banks do not require any nationalization "as they are solid, but in the world there are countries where the idea of nationalization of banks has reasons, of the arrows to your bow, where the banks do their duty or not to finance businesses. "

Sarkozy has also proposed to the premier "the creation of naval battalions French-Italian to hold the room in the Mediterranean."

And after yet another compliment on the skill of Berlusconi:

"And then the media say that you're not a professional ... You have also won the elections in Sardinia," the Knight returns:

"Dear Sarko, the guide of your European half was determined and intelligent. "

But then you do 14.30.

The press conference ends and the poor Nicolas, moreover without Carla Bruni, has run away to go to the Quirinal Palace to meet President of the Republic, Giorgio Napolitano.

Italian URL http://blog.panorama.it/italia/2009/02/24/berlusconi-sarkozy-laccordo-e-totale-e-a-prova-di-atomo

English URL http://translate.google.it/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.panorama.it%2Fitalia%2F2009%2F02%2F24%2Fberlusconi-sarkozy-laccordo-e-totale-e-a-prova-di-atomo%2F&sl=it&tl=en&hl=it&ie=UTF-8

no to the nuke

Silvio restores energy to Italy Tuesday 24.02.2009 17:11 Giuseppe Morello It took 23 years to reopen in the discourse on nuclear power after the Chernobyl disaster which was sterilized between fumes dell'emotività any rational discourse on the sources of energy. Now thanks to the agreement signed by Sarkozy and Berlusconi finally breaks a taboo and Italy back in the space of nuclear power after decades lost two good between self harm and fears shortsighted environmentalism. It is clear that - as experts say (see the excellent "The energy puzzle" by Alberto Clo) - the discourse on nuclear power is complex and there are no certainties, but in the meantime we are not alone but with partners like France that in the area has experienced, towards a future in which the dependence on oil (and all that entails in geopolitical terms) is kept to a minimum. This is another blow to the mark set by the Berlusconi government, whose profile is more strongly marked by "doing" and less exhausting debates that ever comes out of a decision. Nuclear someone can not like it, but meanwhile those who govern have a choice and taking responsibility pulling us out of a deadlock that in recent years has become suffocating. In contrast stands the aphasia of the left and Pd in particular that the energy question also dazzles with a kaleidoscope of views, from nuclear convinced (Chicco Testa for example) up to the proponents of the candle and lamp oil (different from environmentalists to Realacci Pecoraro Scanio). Would be for them to discuss it yet subtle distinction between tangled and fascinating but improbable solutions. There is still a need to explain the polls that give the Pd in the fall and rising Pdl ? giuseppe.morello @ affaritaliani.it Italian URL http://www.affaritaliani.it/economia/silvio24022009.html English URL http://translate.google.it/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.affaritaliani.it%2Feconomia%2Fsilvio24022009.html&sl=it&tl=en&hl=it&ie=UTF-8

no to the nuke

NUCLEAR POWER: THE GREEN, ALSO READY TO REFERENDUM

(AGI) - Roma, 24 feb. - "Before this nuclear pact between Sarkozy and Berlusconi, and in anticipation of the choice of sites for new power plants are ready to consider all political action and struggle, including the referendum."

Says Paolo Cento green, which adds:

"Besides its in a referendum, whose effects are still valid from a legal point of view, 62% of the Italians decided to leave Italy after the nuclear disaster at Chernobyl .

The decision of the Berlusconi government to return to nuclear is just formed a committee to which they have joined hundreds of personality 'of science, politics, culture and of association.

The choice of the nuclear center is at odds not only with a strong opposition, but also making clear the alternative based on renewable energy, energy efficiency. "

Italian URL http://www.agi.it/news/notizie/200902241753-cro-rt11306-art.html

English URL http://translate.google.it/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.agi.it%2Fnews%2Fnotizie%2F200902241753-cro-rt11306-art.html&sl=it&tl=en&hl=it&ie=UTF-8

no to the nuke

NUCLEAR: GASPARRI BETWEEN FRANCE AND ITALY HISTORIC AGREEMENT

(AGI) - Roma, 24 feb. - "The agreement signed between Italy and France on the construction of new nuclear generation and 'a significant step forward that allows us to escape the spiral of energy dependency.

Clean energy at affordable prices. The adoption of nuclear in fact, allowed 'to have an autonomous energy efficiency to reduce significantly the costs of electricity'.

The use, then, the central third generation provides all the necessary guarantees in terms of environmental safety enabling dispel the doubts about this source of energy.

In this and all aspects of the development of nuclear power in Italy for a further talk with, among others, the Minister Claudio Scajola, Chicco Testa (gia 'Enel Chairman), Piero Gnudi, Enel chairman and Giuliano Zuccoli, President Edison, Thursday 'March 26, at 17.30, in the Throne Hall of the Palazzo Altieri in Rome. "

It says the chairman of the Senate Pdl, Maurizio Gasparri.

Italian URL http://www.agi.it/ultime-notizie-page/200902241758-pol-rom1130-art.html

English URL http://translate.google.it/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.agi.it%2Fultime-notizie-page%2F200902241758-pol-rom1130-art.html&sl=it&tl=en&hl=it&ie=UTF-8

no to the nuke

NUCLEAR: BERLUSCONI-SARKOZY, ASSE ITALY-FRANCE

(ANSA) - ROMA -''The future 'in renewable energy and nuclear power, we must wake up''.

And with the French on our side,''he has made available its know-how'', ''we can save many years''and start the construction of nuclear power''at a time''content.

Premier Silvio Berlusconi has no doubts and formalizes the return of nuclear energy in Italy (''slowed in the'70s by the fanaticism of some environmental policy''), illustrating the agreement of energy cooperation just signed during the summit-Italian French Villa Madama, along with French President Nicolas Sarkozy.

And the tenant immediately confirm dell'Eliseo offering to''full and unrestricted cooperation''.

It 'the first step of a''common''nuclear policy between Italy and France in a joint perspective''and''long-term, Berlusconi stressed explaining that according to the agreement, Italy will work''' to the achievement of other nuclear plants in France and other countries and build 'nuclear power''on its territory.

The desk set up in the press room immediately after the ceremony of signing of premier Italian and French President, is in rotation and then the vertices of EdF and Enel, Fulvio Conti, and Pierre Gadonneix, which in turn initialling two Memorandum of Understanding: one for construction in Italy for four nuclear reactors for third-generation (technology EPR) with the launch of the first combined 'by 2020, the other to the extent of participation of the Italian group's nuclear program in France, from reactor Penly recently approved by Paris.

France and 'ready to''give''strong support to Italy, reiterated Sarkozy's idea that nuclear power should become a European issue''because''' is''the key to the future development''.

''We are very pleased to work with a large Italian industry to Flamanville''he adds pointing out that Enel gia 'part in the construction of Normandy.

Berlusconi thanked perche '''Now France with great generosity' is open to us''.

We who were in the'70s''protagonists of''nuclear,''but the fanaticism of some environmental policy''prevented us to build two power''close''to being completed.

A 22 years since that referendum Delay 'the Belpaese, and' however the time to be on a 'clean energy''and''in a safe, insists the premier.

And like the French do that with nuclear power''produces 80% of their energy needs''by allowing consumers to pay overnight bills''half 'of what the Italians pay''. (ANSA).

24/02/2009 20:22

© Copyright ANSA

Italian URL http://www.ansa.it/ambiente/notizie/fdg/200902242022339487/200902242022339487.html

English URL http://translate.google.it/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ansa.it%2Fambiente%2Fnotizie%2Ffdg%2F200902242022339487%2F200902242022339487.html&sl=it&tl=en&hl=it&ie=UTF-8