in the past days the government approved a law called D'Alia, this law takes the name from the person that is in the UDC Union Democratic Christian of Center, interested with Silvio Berlusconi to approve a law, to put the gag to internet as you can see from the movie.
this is the text of the movie:
A. Gilioli: I wanted to talk about this amendment: First, explain the
purpose and usefulness.
D'Alia: The amendment to Article 50 introduces a security package, which allows the Minister of the Interior, upon notice of the court which is a crime of incitement to criminal defense or offense, gives the Ministry of Interior the power to require that providers of Internet connectivity to the network using the tools of filtering with respect to those sites or social network that contain, say, statements and anything else related to these cases of crime.
That is, it's a rule that serves to begin to intervene in the regulation of the Internet and this comes mainly from events that focused on Facebook, the appearance on the social network of groups inneggianti with Riina, Provenzano, the Red Brigades and so on.
And since there is no tool in making an immediate action if it deems such a course of crime, that is, if the judiciary is investigating, the Minister of Interior is involved with a purely precautionary in nature that serves to avoid that there is a proliferation of these sites or these illegal events on the network.
Of course, all this takes place with the possibility of recourse to the court by interested parties, but through a kind of contradictory with the operators of sites to which a notice is served to obscure or delete those parts which are contrary to the positions mentioned.
A. Gilioli: But, Senator, let me interrupt you.
This claim is made that it is this: I read that right its amendment, no one speaks to cancel the parties, but to obscure the site.
Then they say: if there is a group on facebook that calls for Provenzano rather than other things, the effect of his amendment would delete the page, but obscure the entire site.
D'Alia: But excuse me: If the site does not pay to remove these individuals from the site, it is right that the site is obscured.
The Ministry warns the operator, the operator then has two options: either comply and then delete the site group or not comply.
If you do not comply it is an accomplice of those who praise Riina and Provenzano is therefore right that is obscured.
A. Gilioli: In YouTube, for example, there are several videos that may fall, perhaps, within the type that you mentioned.
If YouTube does not delete the video is obscured the YouTube?
D'Alia: I will, of course.
A. Gilioli: Ancora another case ...
D'Alia: Let me give an example: if on a YouTube video comes out, as it happened, and moreover there were several controversies, in which four boys beat their contemporary disabile however, in this case we represent the presence of a crime is not that there is an apology: there is the direct or playing a film in which it is committing a criminal offense is just a site that is maintained ?
I think not.
A. Gilioli: Another case: there is a debate online, on sites in the forums.
Among users of the forum may be that there is also that insults or threatens you.
She believes this is a type ...
D'Alia: If someone threatens me, the threat in reality or on the internet is always a crime.
A. Gilioli: Here are another kind: I am allegedly the author of a blog.
Inside some of my blog, one of the commentators on my blog, I insult, threat.
I who am the blog master and then I think it is fair to leave my blog open to each entry, including those that threaten me, and insult me, do not I hide these items.
Even in this case it corresponds to the type?
D'Alia: Well, come that all those assumptions are set out under the Criminal Code crimes of incitement to murder or to disobey the laws.
The crimes of apology of crime, which are provided by the Criminal Code or other provisions.
These are all assumptions that are brought in this case illegal, who are already penalized in the Penal Code and thus need to be sanctioned in all their manifestations.
It is not that changes if I make a stencils to say that Riina ...
A. Gilioli: Excuse me Senator, we're talking about comments to a blog ...
D'Alia: Well, the comments to a blog is not that different: if in a comment to a blog I would say that the Red Brigades have done well to kill Moro, this is called apology of crime.
What I do on the blog, with a telegram, a card, with a press release does not change:
Always it comes to crime and should be pursued, and should be pursued if the one who makes it an accomplice by publishing these disgraceful, including whether it is an operator of the Internet both to be clear.
I think in this way.
A. Gilioli: Senta senator: you are a frequenter of the network?
D'Alia: Yes
A. Gilioli: On facebook there's going?
D'Alia: No, I go on facebook indigna just because I see on that site that you censurino mothers who breastfeed their children because it is considered an aesthetically offensive, unsightly, and then allow the various groups, such as "Homage to Cutolo, who is a relative of pentiti infamous confidants and please do not subscribe to this site dedicated to Cutolo.
I do not go there because this site that censure the mothers, as also correctly states Article 21, and allows these disgraceful is an unworthy, from my point of view.
With all due respect to those who enter.
A. Gilioli: Are you aware that if you close in YouTube and Facebook are worse in Burma ?
D'Alia: Look, I do not have to close or Facebook or YouTube: I am because Facebook and YouTube respect the victims of the Mafia, terrorism and rapes.
A. Gilioli: And if you do not comply ?
D'Alia: If you do not meet the can not have respect for the rule.
A. Gilioli: So are closed.
D'Alia: It 'obvious.
i invite you, if you got firefox to download the add-ons to download the movies in *.flv, that normally is not possible to download, why are converted in flash video. and many of these movies are on youtube. the same movie that is here, is available on youtube
from Blogger no-reply@google.com
to no.to.the.nuke@gmail.com
date 25 February 2009 12:20
subject http://no-to-the-nuke.blogspot.com/ - ACTION NECESSARY
mailed-by blogger.bounces.google.com
Signed by google.com
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento